Codecave PrintText

[astra]

So:

        public static int PrintFps = 0x33E566 - 0x400000 + (int)baseAdress; //10.33
        public static int PrintName = 0x33E3CA - 0x400000 + (int)baseAdress; //10.33
        public static int ShowFps = 0x83C761 - 0x400000 + (int)baseAdress; // 10.33

or without -0x400000 it's not working.

When i'm looking on older addresses from 10.32 they are totally different..

For example:

        public static int PrintFps = 0x46E566 - 0x400000 + (int)baseAdress; //10.32
AND
        public static int PrintFps = 0x33E566 - 0x400000 + (int)baseAdress; //10.33

[wgrzelak]

without tibia base + 0x400000

[astra]

My OS is win7 and base it's not static so how it's possible ?

And how to convert it to normal addresses like all ?

Ps. really thanks for posting wgrzelak

[XtrmJash]

So:

        public static int PrintFps = 0x33E566 - 0x400000 + (int)baseAdress; //10.33
        public static int PrintName = 0x33E3CA - 0x400000 + (int)baseAdress; //10.33
        public static int ShowFps = 0x83C761 - 0x400000 + (int)baseAdress; // 10.33

or without -0x400000 it's not woring.

When i'm looking on older addresses from 10.32 they are totally different..

For example:

        public static int PrintFps = 0x46E566 - 0x400000 + (int)baseAdress; //10.32
AND
        public static int PrintFps = 0x33E566 - 0x400000 + (int)baseAdress; //10.33

0x33E566 - 0x400000 returns a negative value, this is invalid. Similarly your PrintFPS methods will be incorrect. I'm not sure what your problem is but this may help you somewhat towards working it out.

[XtrmJash]

I'm trying to update this Fcking addresses but i can't ;|
klusbert or XtrmJash can u show me any screenshots or something from Cheat Engine ?
I find this procedure in olly (i think) and where is my addresses ? XD



This procedure on pastebin: http://pastebin.com/gSaBXwSb

I think better method for me its finding by CE but i don't know how to do it ;/

Advice: Find a client for which you know the addresses, look up that address in the exe, and you'll know what to look for in the newer client. See how it links up to what you do know (e.g finding DX9 / DX5 / OGL as a referenced string), and work out a way that you can reliably find the addresses you need every time you want them.

[astra]

I understand but, why my addresses are incorrect, i always do like that: address - 0x400000 (or +0x400000 (depends from that is added before or not)) + tibia base address;
This addresses from ollydbg are different and i don't know why ?

[Blequi]

I understand but, why my addresses are incorrect, i always do like that: address - 0x400000 (or +0x400000 (depends from that is added before or not)) + tibia base address;
This addresses from ollydbg are different and i don't know why ?

When dealing with addresses in ollydbg, you must know you'll see the address in the form of:

ollyaddress = base_address + DESIRED_ADDRESS

But everybody wanna grab DESIRED_ADDRES, so everybody must do

DESIRED_ADDRESS = ollyaddress - base_address

. The only difference is that (almost) everybody working with ollydbg turns ASLR off to use base_address = 0x40...0 to make this process easier. So you have two options:

• turn ASLR off and always use base_address = 0x40...0
• evaluate base_address everytime you found an address. CheatEngine is cool for this task, because you can add "Tibia.exe" as address to get from there.

[wgrzelak]

• turn ASLR off and always use base_address = 0x40...0
• evaluate base_address everytime you found an address. CheatEngine is cool for this task, because you can add "Tibia.exe" as address to get from there.

[astra]

Thanks now i understand it, i write simple tool for reading base address from tibia and it's ok

Really really thanks !!

[Blequi]

cool. I just mentioned CE, because I knew CE had an easy way to get base and olly could lack (because I don't use olly and don't know most of its features)